slenderlock:

"its not fair girls can wear pants and guys cant wear dresses" stfu yes you can. go to jc pennys. buy a cute dress. wear the dress. if anyone says you cant wear the dress. slay them.congratulations you are wearing a dress

(via doctordangerous)

juantreehill:

faceless bloggers are so mysterious  

image

(via screamqueensnufkin)

asylum-art:

Claudine O’Sullivan Illustrations

Artist on Tumblr | Facebook|  MBC

This stunning illustration by final year student Claudine O’Sullivan was judged the winner of the The Coffee Art Project 2013. Chosen from 85 entrants, her watercolour ink and pencil illustration on Khadi paper, will be auctioned to raise funds for Project Waterfall, a charity that work alongside coffee producers to provide water filtration in Tanzania and other coffee producing African countries.

Claudine, who is graduating from BA (Hons) Graphic and Media Design, Illustration and Visual Media pathway, will be showing her final work at London College of Communication’s Summer Show Three from 21 – 28 June 2013.

A traditional illustrator specialising in portraiture, she works mainly in pencil, watercolour and ink and her vivid, abstract portraits are gaining her plenty of praise, with a solo exhibition under her belt in 2013 and an exciting collaboration planned next year.

Her documentation of her time working at an Orphanage in Jaipur, which made up part of a solo exhibition in March, impressed the Managing Director of Allegra, who funded the Coffee Art Project. And a similar trip to Tanzania to photograph and document the work done by Project Waterfall may also be on the cards for early next year.

Claudine has also collaborated on a campaign with domestic violence charity Southall Black Sisters that works with women who have suffered domestic abuse. And with such raw honesty a feature of her beautiful illustrations it’s no surprise charities are keen to have her help them highlight the human faces behind their causes.

(via asylum-art)

rrrrosa:

those songs that start in one earbud and flow into the next

image

(via scaryberries)

caswantsmetochangethisurl:

cellokind:

bluhbluhhugedork:

  • COUPLES CAN BE INTIMATE WITHOUT BEING SEXUAL
  • COUPLES CAN BE INTIMATE WITHOUT BEING SEXUAL
  • COUPLES CAN BE INTIMATE WITHOUT BEING SEXUAL
  • ANYONE CAN BE INTIMATE WITHOUT BEING SEXUAL
  • ANYONE CAN BE INTIMATE WITHOUT BEING SEXUAL
  • ANYONE CAN BE INTIMATE WITHOUT BEING SEXUAL
  • BLOODY MARY
  • BLOODY MARY
  • BLOODY MARY

(via doctordangerous)

dragonstars:

making your friend watch a horrible movie that you have already seen

image

(Source: oceanlapis, via ten-thousandtits)

trickstertier:

trying to get a friends attention like
image

image

(Source: professorsnoozysnore, via itsayskinggay)

hi-coup:

cloudcuckoolander527:

yayfeminism:

One would assume that scientists, who are trained to think objectively, are completely immune to gender discrimination. However, a recent Yale study by Corinne Moss-Racusin and colleagues suggests otherwise.
The researchers created a fictional student and sent out the student’s application to science professors at top, research-intensive universities in the United States. The professors were asked to evaluate how competent this student was, how likely they would be to hire the student, how much they would pay this student, and how willing they would be to mentor the student. All of the applications sent out were identical, except for the fact that half were for a male applicant, John, and half were for a female applicant, Jennifer. Results showed that, with statistical significance, both male and female faculty at these institutions were biased towards male students over female students.
Data from the study shows that on average, science faculty was willing to pay the male applicant about $4,000 more per year. source

"The gender gap doesn’t exist" 
"We don’t need feminism" 
"Maybe he just worked harder"
"*any MRA bullshit*"

I had to read this study for class. It is thorough as fuck.

hi-coup:

cloudcuckoolander527:

yayfeminism:

One would assume that scientists, who are trained to think objectively, are completely immune to gender discrimination. However, a recent Yale study by Corinne Moss-Racusin and colleagues suggests otherwise.

The researchers created a fictional student and sent out the student’s application to science professors at top, research-intensive universities in the United States. The professors were asked to evaluate how competent this student was, how likely they would be to hire the student, how much they would pay this student, and how willing they would be to mentor the student. All of the applications sent out were identical, except for the fact that half were for a male applicant, John, and half were for a female applicant, Jennifer. Results showed that, with statistical significance, both male and female faculty at these institutions were biased towards male students over female students.

Data from the study shows that on average, science faculty was willing to pay the male applicant about $4,000 more per year. 
source

"The gender gap doesn’t exist" 

"We don’t need feminism" 

"Maybe he just worked harder"

"*any MRA bullshit*"

I had to read this study for class. It is thorough as fuck.

(via definitely-tsundere)

lucifcr:

reasons why you should smile today:
1) ur cute
2) cLAIRE FUCKING NOVAK IS COMING BACK IN S10 AND IS DESCRIBED AS PUNK-ROCK-PRETTY I’M GONNA CRY

(via wowthisisentertaining)

r0wdyruff:

help me, i am trapped

in a haiku factory

save me, before they

(Source: litlpup, via scaryberries)

sixpenceee:

here’s something to lighten up your mood !

sixpenceee:

here’s something to lighten up your mood !

(via scaryberries)